Comments on: What the Papers Don't Say http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/04/what-papers-dont-say.html Challenging Climate Orthodoxy Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Editors http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/04/what-papers-dont-say.html#comment-7 Editors Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:35:00 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/what-the-papers-dont-say/#comment-7 Thanks John. We don't feel that sceptics and deniers are helpful labels at all. Hence the scare quotes. Our point is that the views expressed by so-called sceptics and deniers are also expressed by the very IPCC scientists who are supposed to be part of the scientific "consensus". Maybe that wasn't clear enough. Thanks John. We don’t feel that sceptics and deniers are helpful labels at all. Hence the scare quotes. Our point is that the views expressed by so-called sceptics and deniers are also expressed by the very IPCC scientists who are supposed to be part of the scientific “consensus”. Maybe that wasn’t clear enough.

]]> By: John A http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/04/what-papers-dont-say.html#comment-6 John A Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:15:00 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/what-the-papers-dont-say/#comment-6 <i>It's not simply the views of "sceptics" and "deniers" that don't get heard, it's proper and decent scientists too.</i><br/><br/>Can you tell us who the sceptics and deniers are, and how they can be easily distinguished from "proper and decent" scientists? It’s not simply the views of “sceptics” and “deniers” that don’t get heard, it’s proper and decent scientists too.

Can you tell us who the sceptics and deniers are, and how they can be easily distinguished from “proper and decent” scientists?

]]>