Comments on: Scientific Consenseless http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/08/scientific-consenseless.html Challenging Climate Orthodoxy Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Cut and Paste Journalism http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/08/scientific-consenseless.html#comment-56 Cut and Paste Journalism Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:33:56 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/scientific-consenseless/#comment-56 [...] his vast output, in 2007, we reported on Hansen’s 3000-word article in New Scientist where he claimed that sea level rise will be orders of magnitude faster than IPCC projections suggest. When the same [...] [...] his vast output, in 2007, we reported on Hansen’s 3000-word article in New Scientist where he claimed that sea level rise will be orders of magnitude faster than IPCC projections suggest. When the same [...]

]]> By: John Nicklin http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/08/scientific-consenseless.html#comment-55 John Nicklin Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:18:00 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/scientific-consenseless/#comment-55 Well, Al Gore did say that balance is bias. The only story that can be tolerated is AGW=Reality. New Scientist has committed itself to that story line and will stick to it come hell or high water (both, Hansen assures us, will happen.)<br/><br/>Anyone who has been dragged into a discussion of GW knows that if you don't agree, you aren't allowed to speak, the discussion shuts down since you are not "open" to the "truth" there is no point in continuing. Well, Al Gore did say that balance is bias. The only story that can be tolerated is AGW=Reality. New Scientist has committed itself to that story line and will stick to it come hell or high water (both, Hansen assures us, will happen.)

Anyone who has been dragged into a discussion of GW knows that if you don’t agree, you aren’t allowed to speak, the discussion shuts down since you are not “open” to the “truth” there is no point in continuing.

]]>