<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change Rhetoric Worse Than Previously Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/11/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/11/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than.html</link>
	<description>Challenging Climate Orthodoxy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:05:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cut and Paste Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/11/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than.html/comment-page-1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Cut and Paste Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/11/18/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than-previously-thought/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] There has certainly been a shift in rhetoric from ‘urgent to panicky’, but that shift is not justified by ‘the science’. The IPCC’s AR4 gave no reason to believe that thermageddon was any closer than it was when its predecessor AR3 came out. To make it sound like it did, environmentalist commentators - notably those at the BBC - also had to cut and paste. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has certainly been a shift in rhetoric from ‘urgent to panicky’, but that shift is not justified by ‘the science’. The IPCC’s AR4 gave no reason to believe that thermageddon was any closer than it was when its predecessor AR3 came out. To make it sound like it did, environmentalist commentators &#8211; notably those at the BBC &#8211; also had to cut and paste. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/11/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than.html/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2007/11/18/climate-change-rhetoric-worse-than-previously-thought/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Excellent commentary. Why is no one in the media bothering to actually do their job and exercise a bit of judgement in critically assessing developments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent commentary. Why is no one in the media bothering to actually do their job and exercise a bit of judgement in critically assessing developments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
