Comments on: In a Sea of Greens http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/02/in-sea-of-greens.html Challenging Climate Orthodoxy Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:47:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: john a. bailo http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/02/in-sea-of-greens.html#comment-233 john a. bailo Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:07:00 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/in-a-sea-of-greens/#comment-233 I prefer the term Naturo-genic Global Warmers (NGW) to "skeptic". Skeptic implies negating an argument without providing an alternative. NGW implies that we recognize the data and that we believe that it may be one of many natural causes (Svensmark's cosmic rays being an extremely strong contender). I prefer the term Naturo-genic Global Warmers (NGW) to “skeptic”. Skeptic implies negating an argument without providing an alternative. NGW implies that we recognize the data and that we believe that it may be one of many natural causes (Svensmark’s cosmic rays being an extremely strong contender).

]]> By: Dream Liner http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/02/in-sea-of-greens.html#comment-232 Dream Liner Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:58:00 +0000 http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/in-a-sea-of-greens/#comment-232 Hmmm - interesting lineup but I can't get over the fact that they have created a separate "skeptics" category, as if none of the skeptics sites can't be in "must read", "The news blogs" or "The scientists". Of course, RealClimate is listed in the scientists but ClimateAudit not.<br/>This list is their lame attempt at showing their "balanced" approach but they are clearly delineating skeptics as they are a separate category - in the fringes Hmmm – interesting lineup but I can’t get over the fact that they have created a separate “skeptics” category, as if none of the skeptics sites can’t be in “must read”, “The news blogs” or “The scientists”. Of course, RealClimate is listed in the scientists but ClimateAudit not.
This list is their lame attempt at showing their “balanced” approach but they are clearly delineating skeptics as they are a separate category – in the fringes

]]>