<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happened to the Precautionary Principle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html</link>
	<description>Challenging Climate Orthodoxy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Resistance &#187; It’s all in the Head…lines</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Resistance &#187; It’s all in the Head…lines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>[...] to defend the ground he stands on. We’ve covered the “tobacco” argument before, here and here.  How can an academic in such a prestigious and privileged role make such a bullshit argument – [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to defend the ground he stands on. We’ve covered the “tobacco” argument before, here and here.  How can an academic in such a prestigious and privileged role make such a bullshit argument – [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Hi Lee, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Does &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/07/great-solar-warming-squabble.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this work?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee, </p>
<p>Does <a HREF="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/07/great-solar-warming-squabble.html" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">this work?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t copy and paste that URL - can you write it as an HTML link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t copy and paste that URL &#8211; can you write it as an HTML link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editors</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lee. We doubt we&#039;ll be blogging this one. But we did do a post the last time a single British study falsified that same entire school of thought, last year. Here you go:&lt;br/&gt;http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/07/great-solar-warming-squabble.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lee. We doubt we&#8217;ll be blogging this one. But we did do a post the last time a single British study falsified that same entire school of thought, last year. Here you go:<br /><a href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/07/great-solar-warming-squabble.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/07/great-solar-warming-squabble.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Guys - did you see the report last week about the British scientific team that had &quot;disproved&quot; the &quot;maverick&quot; theory that global warming is caused by variations in the sun&#039;s activity? The reportage was very instructive about the hegemony of the GW &quot;consensus&quot; &amp; journos basic misunderstanding of how science works. That is, they claimed one British study falsified an entire school of thought originating in Denmark, ergo, we must reduce CO2 emissions. Might be worth looking up the reports and doing a post on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys &#8211; did you see the report last week about the British scientific team that had &#8220;disproved&#8221; the &#8220;maverick&#8221; theory that global warming is caused by variations in the sun&#8217;s activity? The reportage was very instructive about the hegemony of the GW &#8220;consensus&#8221; &#038; journos basic misunderstanding of how science works. That is, they claimed one British study falsified an entire school of thought originating in Denmark, ergo, we must reduce CO2 emissions. Might be worth looking up the reports and doing a post on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich13</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2008/04/what-happened-to-precautionary-principle.html#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>rich13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateresistance.wordpress.com/2008/04/04/what-happened-to-the-precautionary-principle/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Particularly excellent stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Particularly excellent stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

