Comments on: Ragin’ Roberts http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/02/ragin-roberts.html Challenging Climate Orthodoxy Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:09:43 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Editors http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/02/ragin-roberts.html/comment-page-1#comment-1068 Editors Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:58:14 +0000 http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=287#comment-1068 Whoever you are, the points you raise have been raised many times, and we've answered them many times, most recently in the thread that your comment was moved to, following your comment. http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/12/physician-heal-thyself.html Your error is in not reading the posts and the comments carefully enough, which makes your pedantry all the more tiresome. We'd expect a more sophisticated criticism from a NASA employee. Maybe not, eh? Whoever you are, the points you raise have been raised many times, and we’ve answered them many times, most recently in the thread that your comment was moved to, following your comment. http://www.climate-resistance.org/2007/12/physician-heal-thyself.html

Your error is in not reading the posts and the comments carefully enough, which makes your pedantry all the more tiresome.

We’d expect a more sophisticated criticism from a NASA employee.

Maybe not, eh?

]]> By: nimbleJim http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/02/ragin-roberts.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067 nimbleJim Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:32:06 +0000 http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=287#comment-1067 Erm, who's Kevin? You have me for someone else. You bring up Dessler's comments and also Robert's remarks on consensus. My post is relevant given that you use this point to beat both Dessler and Roberts. As I'm suggesting, your erroneous analysis of the WGII and the false attribution of its results to the physical basis of climate change make your criticisms of Dessler and Roberts on this point invalid. By all means continue your rant about Roberts but you should either modify the original article, remove the criticism of Dessler and Roberts on this point or deal with my criticisms here. Erm, who’s Kevin? You have me for someone else.

You bring up Dessler’s comments and also Robert’s remarks on consensus. My post is relevant given that you use this point to beat both Dessler and Roberts. As I’m suggesting, your erroneous analysis of the WGII and the false attribution of its results to the physical basis of climate change make your criticisms of Dessler and Roberts on this point invalid. By all means continue your rant about Roberts but you should either modify the original article, remove the criticism of Dessler and Roberts on this point or deal with my criticisms here.

]]> By: Editors http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/02/ragin-roberts.html/comment-page-1#comment-1066 Editors Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:49:06 +0000 http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=287#comment-1066 Kevin, we moved your comment to the post that it related to. Kevin,

we moved your comment to the post that it related to.

]]>