<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ward Loses Patience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/05/ward-loses-patience.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/05/ward-loses-patience.html</link>
	<description>Challenging Climate Orthodoxy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xjboy550</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/05/ward-loses-patience.html#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>xjboy550</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=333#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>&#039;Just like Prince Charles, eh chaps? Pip pip!&#039;
hmm bit childish mr ward ?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Just like Prince Charles, eh chaps? Pip pip!&#8217;<br />
hmm bit childish mr ward ?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/05/ward-loses-patience.html#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=333#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>This is another reason why the AGW bunch lost credibility, as far as I&#039;m concerned. Whilst it is important to question someone&#039;s potential vested interests, that in itself proves nothing. And yet AGW alarmists simply dismiss skeptic scientists without listening to the rational questions of evidence and theory. It even gets to the point where it goes full circle and they believe that skepticism itself is EVIDENCE of funding bias, even if there is no real evidence of funding. AGW alarmists lose credibility when they apparently lose the ability to think. Those who want to give up the rigour of rational thinking, just because it is inconvenient, can go back to wearing grass skirts and performing rain dances. I&#039;d sooner trust a CEO of a Corp who can think clearly than any Eco warrior who operates in a confused cloud of beliefs and intuitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another reason why the AGW bunch lost credibility, as far as I&#8217;m concerned. Whilst it is important to question someone&#8217;s potential vested interests, that in itself proves nothing. And yet AGW alarmists simply dismiss skeptic scientists without listening to the rational questions of evidence and theory. It even gets to the point where it goes full circle and they believe that skepticism itself is EVIDENCE of funding bias, even if there is no real evidence of funding. AGW alarmists lose credibility when they apparently lose the ability to think. Those who want to give up the rigour of rational thinking, just because it is inconvenient, can go back to wearing grass skirts and performing rain dances. I&#8217;d sooner trust a CEO of a Corp who can think clearly than any Eco warrior who operates in a confused cloud of beliefs and intuitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/05/ward-loses-patience.html#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 06:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=333#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>I love the idea that the day I read this article on your website, I see a &#039;New! - please donate&#039; link added.  Does this mean that your source of &#039;Exxon style funding&#039; has dried up...?

Perhaps if Bob Ward really believes his own hyperbole about your funding sources, he can instead donate some of his own money, as I bet he secretly loves the idea of you writing articles about him anyway.  It will undoubtedly, add to the &#039;victim&#039; mentality that he and his ilk seem to revel in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea that the day I read this article on your website, I see a &#8216;New! &#8211; please donate&#8217; link added.  Does this mean that your source of &#8216;Exxon style funding&#8217; has dried up&#8230;?</p>
<p>Perhaps if Bob Ward really believes his own hyperbole about your funding sources, he can instead donate some of his own money, as I bet he secretly loves the idea of you writing articles about him anyway.  It will undoubtedly, add to the &#8216;victim&#8217; mentality that he and his ilk seem to revel in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

