<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Facelift: Climate resistance v3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html</link>
	<description>Challenging Climate Orthodoxy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:09:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Weston</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick response, and that 10% makes quite a big difference.

I do realise that there are things that I can do with font sizes on my own browser.  But - without wanting to sound too militant - I think that accessibility should be the publisher&#039;s concern, not the reader&#039;s, at least within reasonable limits.

I shall now go back to praying for the end of the current fad for grey text on a white background, and its eventual disappearance from standard templates. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick response, and that 10% makes quite a big difference.</p>
<p>I do realise that there are things that I can do with font sizes on my own browser.  But &#8211; without wanting to sound too militant &#8211; I think that accessibility should be the publisher&#8217;s concern, not the reader&#8217;s, at least within reasonable limits.</p>
<p>I shall now go back to praying for the end of the current fad for grey text on a white background, and its eventual disappearance from standard templates. <img src='http://www.climate-resistance.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Mark, I have increased the text size by 10%. This was the most I felt I could increase it by, without detracting from the design. 

Please let me know if it is enough, an if it has caused problems elsewhere. 

Most browsers allow you to expand the web page by holding the control button, and rolling the middle mouse wheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I have increased the text size by 10%. This was the most I felt I could increase it by, without detracting from the design. </p>
<p>Please let me know if it is enough, an if it has caused problems elsewhere. </p>
<p>Most browsers allow you to expand the web page by holding the control button, and rolling the middle mouse wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Weston</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>My eyesight&#039;s pretty bad and I always found the high contrast/low glare combination of white-on-black particularly easy to read.  I realise experiences differ here.  

However, if you are trying to be friendlier to weaker or older eyes, why such a small typeface?  Combine the size of the type with the use of various shades of grey in some of the text styles (most importantly, the one used for quoted text) and the result is small text with low contrast which is pretty hard to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My eyesight&#8217;s pretty bad and I always found the high contrast/low glare combination of white-on-black particularly easy to read.  I realise experiences differ here.  </p>
<p>However, if you are trying to be friendlier to weaker or older eyes, why such a small typeface?  Combine the size of the type with the use of various shades of grey in some of the text styles (most importantly, the one used for quoted text) and the result is small text with low contrast which is pretty hard to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Cull</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Cull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Donna, just to say I think Twitter is becoming an excellent communication tool, and one that appears to be currently under-used by those of us of the sceptic persuasion. If 350.org and Greenpeace can send messages instantly to thousands of followers and mobilise support for their various campaigns, logically so can AGW-sceptic sites and blogs such as Climate Resistance. (I&#039;m now following NOconsensus, by the way.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna, just to say I think Twitter is becoming an excellent communication tool, and one that appears to be currently under-used by those of us of the sceptic persuasion. If 350.org and Greenpeace can send messages instantly to thousands of followers and mobilise support for their various campaigns, logically so can AGW-sceptic sites and blogs such as Climate Resistance. (I&#8217;m now following NOconsensus, by the way.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Laframboise</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Laframboise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>Absolutely love the re-design. It looks professional and if one wants to be taken seriously by moderate, ordinary folk (or those rare media people who have an open mind), professionalism is important.

I&#039;ve become a faithful reader and regularly promote your posts on Twitter (http://twitter.com/NOconsensus) and elsewhere.

I, too, feel an indexing/improved tagging system would be massively helpful. I think Google has a widget that can be inserted which will automatically search the entire site. Not a perfect solution for a large site, but a step in the right direction perhaps.

Please keep your solid, sensible analysis coming. Some days one feels as if one must be losing one&#039;s mind. You two help provide reassurance that this isn&#039;t the case. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely love the re-design. It looks professional and if one wants to be taken seriously by moderate, ordinary folk (or those rare media people who have an open mind), professionalism is important.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve become a faithful reader and regularly promote your posts on Twitter (<a href="http://twitter.com/NOconsensus" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/NOconsensus</a>) and elsewhere.</p>
<p>I, too, feel an indexing/improved tagging system would be massively helpful. I think Google has a widget that can be inserted which will automatically search the entire site. Not a perfect solution for a large site, but a step in the right direction perhaps.</p>
<p>Please keep your solid, sensible analysis coming. Some days one feels as if one must be losing one&#8217;s mind. You two help provide reassurance that this isn&#8217;t the case. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>The site design seems a little more &quot;pedestrian&quot; than the prior incarnation, but as long as the wonderful analysis continues I will take what comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site design seems a little more &#8220;pedestrian&#8221; than the prior incarnation, but as long as the wonderful analysis continues I will take what comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. 

We will have to work out a way of making tags work. If you know of any sites that have particularly good systems in place, please let us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. </p>
<p>We will have to work out a way of making tags work. If you know of any sites that have particularly good systems in place, please let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>Redesign looks good. Keep up the good work.

Suggestion: maybe have a list of the most-visited and/or most-commented-upon posts, underneath &#039;tags&#039; or suchlike? Or keep a list of your &quot;key&quot; posts where you make the most hard-hitting analysis or revelations? I agree with Luis that this is blog is a key resource for those of us who are critical but lack the time/ resources to do the thinking, writing and website coding ourselves. So thank you for all your hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redesign looks good. Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Suggestion: maybe have a list of the most-visited and/or most-commented-upon posts, underneath &#8216;tags&#8217; or suchlike? Or keep a list of your &#8220;key&#8221; posts where you make the most hard-hitting analysis or revelations? I agree with Luis that this is blog is a key resource for those of us who are critical but lack the time/ resources to do the thinking, writing and website coding ourselves. So thank you for all your hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Cull</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Cull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Like Geoff, I agree that the new look is easier to read - my middle-aged eyes are very grateful, although I did quite like the underground, light-on-dark format as well (best viewed on Google Chrome, to avoid the lengthy &quot;countdown&quot;.) Long may this thought-provoking blog continue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Geoff, I agree that the new look is easier to read &#8211; my middle-aged eyes are very grateful, although I did quite like the underground, light-on-dark format as well (best viewed on Google Chrome, to avoid the lengthy &#8220;countdown&#8221;.) Long may this thought-provoking blog continue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/11/site-facelift-climate-resistance-v3-0.html/comment-page-1#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-resistance.org/?p=403#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>Excellent redesign, thank you, look just great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent redesign, thank you, look just great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
