tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3647126962862750972.post1953282841032382462..comments2007-08-02T18:18:48.357+01:00Editorsnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3647126962862750972.post-71196701101874314142007-08-02T18:18:00.000+01:002007-08-02T18:18:00.000+01:00Well, Al Gore did say that balance is bias. The only story that can be tolerated is AGW=Reality. New Scientist has committed itself to that story line and will stick to it come hell or high water (both, Hansen assures us, will happen.)<BR/><BR/>Anyone who has been dragged into a discussion of GW knows that if you don't agree, you aren't allowed to speak, the discussion shuts down since you are not "open" to the "truth" there is no point in continuing.John Nicklinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15466423012662670782noreply@blogger.com