Climate Resistance: Go Forth and Multiply

Friday, May 25, 2007

Go Forth and Multiply

Anyone doubting that environmentalists' doomsday visions of the future owe more to religion than science should know that Greenpeace are building an ark on Mount Ararat. No, really.

1 comments:

Carnival of Climate Change said...: Your blog post caught someone's attention and was submitted to our new blog carnival for the first edition. We hope you will submit future posts on global warming or climate change.

http://carnivalofclimatechange.blogspot.com/2007/06/carnival-of-climate-change-volume-1.html; 07 June 2007 05:23

Post a Comment

CHALLENGING CLIMATE ORTHODOXY...

We believe that an unfounded sense of crisis - and therefore urgency - dominates public discussion of environmental issues. Thus, demands for urgent action to mitigate climate change thrive at the expense of genuine, illuminating, nuanced debate.

Neither the science nor the politics of climate change should be exempt from scrutiny. Our intention is to provide some decent commentary on how science, politics and the media handle environmental matters, for anyone interested in challenging this dangerous new orthodoxy...

read on...

Climate Resistance's starting position:

1. There is good scientific evidence that human activities are influencing the climate.

2. The evidence for anthropogenic climate change is neither as strong nor as demanding of action as is widely claimed.

3. Our ability to mitigate, let alone reverse any such change through reductions in CO2 emissions is even less certain.

4. The scientific consensus on climate change as widely reported inaccurately reflects the true scientific consensus.

5. There is no scientific consensus on how society should proceed in the face of a changing climate.

6. How society should proceed in the face of a changing climate is the business of politics.

7. Science does not and should not proceed by consensus.

8. Political arguments about climate change are routinely mistaken for scientific ones.

9. The IPCC is principally a political organisation.

10. Environmentalism is principally a political phenomenon.

11. And yet climate change policies go unchallenged by opposition parties.

12. The goals/aspirations/values of society are/should be matters of politics, not science.

13. The current emphasis on mitigation strategies is impeding society's ability to adapt to a changing climate, whatever its cause.

14. The public remain unconvinced that mitigation is in their best interests.

15. Widespread disengagement from politics means that politicians pander only to the loudest, shrillest voices.

16. Science is increasingly expected to provide moral certainty in morally uncertain times.

17. Environmental concerns are serving to provide direction for directionless politics.

Climate Resistance

Friday, May 25, 2007

Go Forth and Multiply

1 comments:

CHALLENGING CLIMATE ORTHODOXY...

Interesting Sites and Blogs

Elsewhere

Archive